Aluminum is considered by
most health authorities perfectly acceptable to eat, wear as an
antiperspirant, and inject into your body as a vaccine adjuvant, but new
research indicates it has cancer-causing properties, even at levels 100,000 times lower than found in certain consumer products.
A concerning new study published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry
demonstrates clearly that exposure to aluminum can increase migratory
and invasive properties of human breast cancer cells. This has
extremely important implications, because mortality from breast
cancer is caused by the spread of the tumor and not from the presence of
the primary tumor in the breast itself. This profound difference, in fact, is why a groundbreaking new National Cancer Institute commissioned expert panel
recently called for the complete reclassification of some types of
non-progressive 'breast cancer' and 'prostate cancer' as essentially
benign lesions – bittersweet news for the millions who were already misdiagnosed/overdiagnosed and mistreated/overtreated for 'cancer' over the past 30 years.
Another recent relevant study, also published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, found increased levels of aluminum
in noninvasively collected nipple aspirate fluids from 19 breast cancer
patients compared with 16 healthy control subjects. The researchers
commented on their findings: "In addition to emerging evidence,
our results support the possible involvement of aluminium ions in
oxidative and inflammatory status perturbations of breast cancer
microenvironment, suggesting aluminium accumulation in breast
microenvironment as a possible risk factor for oxidative/inflammatory
phenotype of breast cells."[1]
A key implication of this research is
that the common ingestion (food additive), injection (as a vaccine
adjuvant), and topical application (antiperspirant) of forms of aluminum
may be contributing to the burgeoning cancer epidemic in exposed
populations. Given this possibility, the further use of aluminum in
foods, cosmetics and drugs should be halted until adequate risk
assessments can be made thoroughly proving its safety. (Since we do not
use the precautionary principle to guide risk assessments and their
regulation in the US, instead opting for a chemical and drug-industry
favoring "weight of evidence" standard, this likely will not happen;
however, we can use this information to apply the precautionary
principle in our own lives)
When it comes to aluminum's presence in antiperspirant formulas, a very concerning study published last year in the Journal of Applied Toxicology
identified the primary form of aluminum used in underarm cosmetics –
aluminum chloride – as capable of altering breast cancer cells in a way
indicative of 'neoplastic transformation,' or, the transformation of a
healthy cell into a cancerous one:
"These results suggest that aluminium is not generically mutagenic, but similar to an activated oncogene [cancer-causing gene], it induces proliferation stress, DSBs and senescence in normal mammary epithelial cells; and that long-term exposure to AlCl(3) generates and selects for cells able to bypass p53/p21(Waf1) -mediated cellular senescence. Our observations do not formally identify aluminium as a breast carcinogen, but challenge the safety ascribed to its widespread use in underarm cosmetics."
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten